Jeff Bursey - Canadian novelist, short-story writer, playwright, literary critic
A TREASURE FOR LOVERS OF EXCEPTIONAL LITERATURE
Jeff Bursey's Assume A Position: Considerations and Interviews contains a Preface and three parts:
Part 1: Writing on writing - Five essays addressing the state of fiction, specifically the nature and expansiveness of the novel;
Part 2: Fiction and Non-Fiction Reviews - more than three dozen individual reviews, including a number of books by Canadian authors;
Part 3: Interviews - Jeff interviews three writers: Sam Savage, Michelle Butler Hallett and S.D. Chrostowska.
For a fuller taste of what readers will encounter here, I've linked my comments with direct author quotes from the Preface and one piece from each of the three parts.
PREFACE
“Apart
from taste, there's advocacy for the unjustly ignored who, willfully or
not, travel the lumber and mountain roads that weave through the
literary map.”
Many authors, including those from Jeff's home
country of Canada, write in ways that will generally not harvest a large
mainstream readership. But that's not what these singular writers are
after; rather, they follow their own voice and vision. And it's these
experimental writers challenging convention that Jeff finds most to his
taste.
With this in mind, Jeff writes: “The essays and reviews
collected here stem from that long-lasting objection, which includes
resistance to the parochial nature of many (not all) Canadian journals,
mainstream newspapers, and radio competitions as they try to determine
the reading life of a country.”
Building on this, Jeff goes on
to write: “Our literature needs healthy and, at times, rowdy arguments
as authors, publishers, and readers balance the input submitted to
Goodreads (often at great length and with erudition) and well-written
blogs dedicated to keeping an eye on current writing against the
dwindling national dialogue in papers about books as aesthetic objects.”
Jeff maintains a high standard for works of literature: it doesn't
matter what the subject, whether the book is fiction or non-fiction, if a
book isn't well-written, it deserves a negative review complete with
specific examples as to how and why the book falls short.
“Art
doesn't reconcile a country's divisions; it speaks for and to people who
are that country, and it often shows ugly truths that take considerable
time to be raged against, met halfway, digested, and then accepted to
some degree or else disavowed wholeheartedly.”
Ha! Jeff is clear
– a work of literature is not meant to engender a crowd or nation of
people to feel a sense of kinship the way they feel kinship when singing
the national anthem at a hockey game. Not at all – a high quality work
of literature can sting, can cause outrage, can prompt us to question
our fundamental assumptions and even our very sense of identity, both
individually and collectively.
PART 1 WRITING ON WRITING
The Cruft of Fiction: Mega-Novels and the Science of Paying Attention by David Letzler
Cruft
is a word taking from the world of programming referring to things like
convoluted, poorly written computer code or wiki entries. Applied to
literature, cruft refers to sections of a text that can be seen as
pointless, gratuitous, excessive, too complicated for its own good.
Think of mega-novels such as William Gaddis' JR, John Barth's The Soft-Weed Factor, Mark Z. Danielewski's House of Leaves or that ultimate doorstop, Thomas Pynchon's Gravity's Rainbow.
Such mega-novels contain page after page after page of things like
lists, extraneous dialogue, or the minutiae of financial data,
scientific data, you name it.
Those reviewers and critics who dislike cruft write in a similar spirit of Jonathan Frazen's scathing essay of William Gaddis, Mr. Difficult.
But David Letzler and Jeff Bursey take exception. Here's a key Letzler
quote: “By creating a counterfeit world too expansive to process, what
they (the authors of meta-novels) satirize is the limits of their
readers' own minds.” And Jeff notes “it is important to stress that
regard for writing as an art”, thus “cruft is not a flaw”. Indeed, Jeff
continues: “Often, but not necessarily, cruft aims to help us consider
the greater purpose of linguistic inventiveness."
PART 2 FICTION AND NON-FICTION REVIEWS
Kjersti A. Skomsvold The Faster I Walk, the Smaller I Am
A
novel by a thirty-something Norwegian author that's written as a long
monologue delivered by an elderly widow by the name of Mathea Martinsen
who has had one remarkable thing happen in her life: back when she was a
schoolgirl out on the school yard, she was struck by lightning.
A trio of quotes from the review:
“What
we have is a study in willful isolation and a collection of often banal
thoughts that become something higher, by virtue of the author's
patience (and perhaps our own).”
We are put into the mind of
someone who deliberately estranges herself from others or has been
estranged; the book doesn't contain an explanation that would satisfy
the curiosity. And there's no reason for it to do so. Without round
characterization or background we are adrift, or more accurately,
encouraged to see Mathea in isolation.”
“Perhaps Mathea doesn't
have a sense of humour and merely expresses herself in ways we
categorize as humourous. Her contentment at staying home and doing a bit
of housework now and then rather than, for example, walking through a
park or working underlines her emotional distance from people; her
seemingly humourous remarks may in fact be very straightforward ones
that lack emotional content. How they sound to us consequently would be
different from what Mathea means to communicate.”
The way Jeff
provides an overview of Skomsvoid's authorial voice and digs into the
detail of the author's novel with a focus on Mathea's psychological
states brings to mind a quote from another essay included in the book, Beyond the Blurb: On Critics and Criticism
by Daniel Green. “Like Green, when reading Wood (literary critic James
Wood) I'm conscious that he is reducing the work of literature down to
one preferred method of approach, that this is ungenerous to those who
think in alternate ways, and that the aim of making anything different
conform to a critical perspective rather than choosing to learn
something new is to limit oneself needlessly.” Reading this review and
all the other reviews collected here, this is the difference that makes
all the difference: Jeff opens himself completely to the author's
vision, no matter how radical, and this openness gives Jeff's reviews an
undeniable freshness.
Other authors in this section of book
reviews include, for example, Evelyn Hampton, Michelle Tea, Larry
Foundation, Lance Olson, Harry Mullish, Anne Garréta, Félix Fénéon,
Harry Mathews, Karl Ove Knausgaard, Merilyn Simonds, Olga Tokarczuk and
Gina Frangello.
PART 3 INTERVIEWS
It Is Not a Novelist's Job to be Merciful: An Interview with Sam Savage
Here's
a batch of excerpts from this 2015 interview Jeff conducted where
American author Sam Savage shares his reflections on a number of topics:
On what he rebelled against during his teenage years -
“Against
everything and nothing—mindless encompassing anger, a condition of such
unrestraint that parents would not let their sons and daughters get in
the car with me for fear I would entangle them in some catastrophe. It’s
a miracle I got out of that alive.”
On his characters -
"The
characters in the novels are searching for meaning in the world and in
their lives. I regret if that sounds terribly old-school and cliché.
Meaning is not something you can invent, something you can freely
choose. If you can choose it you can unchoose it just as easily. It has
come from without in some sense. It has to make a claim upon you.
Nothing I have seen in the world as I understand it (the
natural-scientific world) is capable of making such a claim, and all my
protagonists experience that."
On illness -
"Illness is a
world of its own. Everything is colored by it. I have outlived my
prognosis by many years, but for decades the illness would not let me
contemplate a “normal” life stretching into a vague and distant future.
All my narrators are, one way or the other, in the process of dying."
On becoming a writer -
"I
was eighteen when I first imagined becoming a writer. By the time I
dropped out of college at twenty I saw writing as what I essentially
did, everything else being ancillary to that. And so it has been ever
since except for the five or six years I was obsessed with philosophy. I
wrote a great deal, mostly poetry, but fragments of novels as well, and
disliked what I wrote, and threw it out. I was not discouraged by
rejections."
On the nature of writing -
"Genuine writing,
writing that is true and good, is a product of compulsion. It possesses
the shape and content it does because you can’t do it any other way. It
took me a long time to feel that what I wrote was coming out of that
kind of necessity."
On listening to music while writing -
"In
fact I don’t understand how some people can do that. When I write I
have rhythms in my head that are impossible to hear when other rhythms
are being laid on top of them."
On the writing process -
"I
know it isn’t going well when it stops going, when further paragraphs
fail to appear. I struggle with it for a while – where “struggle” means
staring out the window – and if nothing comes, I drop it. That’s the
usual way. Lots of false starts. But now and then the character takes
over. It’s a feeling many novelists have, I think – that the character,
or the writer’s unconscious mind, takes command of the story to such an
extent that you feel you are taking dictation."
On his future biographers -
"I
am a very private person (weird in this day and age, I know). I don’t
like the idea of strangers rummaging without restriction in my life, in
my past, or in work that I thought not good enough to publish."
----------------------------
Again,
if you're a lover of literature after a fresh infusion of energy, this
collection of essays, reviews and interviews is your book.
Comments
Post a Comment