Homage to Anatole Broyard as Book Reviewer
Back
in the 1960s - 1980s Anatole Broyard wrote reviews for The New York
Times. Here's one of his reviews I particularly enjoy since I'm on a
Anthony Burgess run at the moment:
ENDERBY'S DARK LADY. By Anthony Burgess
Poor, lecherous, unreliable, believing in nothing but his art, Anthony
Burgess's Enderby stands for a long line of louche or maudit poets
stretching through the centuries from Francois Villon, Richard Savage
and Baudelaire to Delmore Schwartz, Dylan Thomas and John Berryman.
Enderby is a defender of literature and a subverter of everything else.
His life is a sprung rhythm of desperate improvisation. He wears his
poetry like a secret weapon for which he has no license. He is a hustler
of sensibility, an opportunist of inspiration.
Mr. Burgess is so
fond of Enderby - by far his best creation - that he has devoted four
books to him: ''Inside Mr. Enderby'' and ''Enderby Outside,'' which were
published in 1968, ''The Clockwork Testament'' in 1975, and now,
''Enderby's Dark Lady.'' Mr. Burgess killed off Enderby in the third
book, and then, realizing his mistake, disinterred him. Taking their cue
from him, McGraw-Hill has reissued the three earlier books in both
paperback and hard cover to accompany the new one.
In his
reincarnation, Enderby comes to the United States to write the book for a
musical play about Shakespeare's life. The production is planned as a
joint celebration of the 360th anniversary of Shakespeare's death and
our own Bicentennial. The relation between the two events is clear only
to Mrs. Schoenbaum, a rich Indiana woman who is sponsoring the play.
Since Mr. Burgess surely knows that America's leading Shakespeare
scholar is also named Schoenbaum, he would seem to be mischievous here.
If he is, however, this much of his satire is misplaced, for Samuel
Schoenbaum is a very good writer as well as a highly respected
authority.
Enderby has been chosen for the job on the basis of a
fantasy he published about Shakespeare and Ben Jonson. Serving as the
first chapter of ''Enderby's Dark Lady,'' this fantasy enables Mr.
Burgess to show us how skillfully he imitates the Elizabethan style. In
fact, most of the fun of the book arises out of the various versions of
Shakespeare - from pastiche to parody - that go into the musical.
The
songwriter proposes a number that begins ''To be or not to be/ in love
with you'' and rhymes this with ''To spend my entire life/ hand in glove
with you.'' Enderby objects and offers a dreadfully faithful version of
Elizabethan song. The issue is decided by the female star, April Elgar,
who plays the Dark Lady of the Sonnets.
As an American
innovation, Shakespeare's Dark Lady is black. She is played by a
beautiful nightclub singer who inspires Enderby to write lyrics like
''The white man's knavery/ sold me in slavery/ to an unsavoury.''
Enderby rhymes stallion, rapscallion and galleon. He writes ''To be or
not to be/ smitten by you/ bitten by you.''
Scholarly opinion is divided as to whether Shakespeare did or did not have a homosexual affair with the Earl of Southampton. Mr. Burgess is among the believers and makes some of his less successful jokes on the subject. For the most part, though, he is as loyal to the Bard as Enderby is. When the play finally does go on, Enderby is forced to substitute for the male lead, who has been injured in a car accident, and he does a creditable job of improvising Elizabethan lines when he cannot remember them.
When
April takes him to her family home for Christmas, she passes Enderby off
to her mother and father as a Baptist minister. Inevitably, he is asked
to preach a sermon in church, but except for a fine opening - ''Do not
be afraid of poets'' - Enderby does not seize the day with any real
conviction. His relation to April is inconclusive too, as if, having
created a black heroine, Mr. Burgess is not sure how to deal with her.
While
it is funny and clever, ''Enderby's Dark Lady'' is not as good as the
previous three books. It's as if Mr. Burgess's poet still has one foot
in the grave and feels a bit confused by his reincarnation. Still, it's
good to see him back. Let's hope the blood returns to his cheek in his
next appearance.
Comments
Post a Comment